• Throughout Christian history, believers have wrestled with a central question: Does salvation depend on our own merit, or is it solely the work of God’s grace? Modern debates (in particular when Catholics and Orthodox are mischaracterized) often force a false choice between salvation earned through effort on one hand and salvation received by faith alone without any meaningful role for obedience on the other. But when we return to Scripture and the writings of the early Church Fathers, we find a much richer and more integrated understanding.

    Let’s start where there is common ground between Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant traditions. Salvation (justification) is by grace through faith (Ephesians 2:8-9). Justification cannot be earned. Both see the works (fruits) as evidence of our salvation. From there, however, there is divergence between Catholics and Orthodox on one side who view salvation as a process (grace through faith working itself out in love by participating in the work God called us to do, Ephesians 2:10); and Protestants on the other side who largely see salvation (justification) as a one-time “born again” experience. In the former view, the works are seen as a free will cooperation with God’s grace. While in the latter view, works are seen solely as evidence of one’s salvation, and not indicative of eternal security.

    So, in studying scripture through the lens of the early Church, what do we learn about the true nature of our ultimate salvation?

    The biblical and patristic vision is not merit-based in the sense of humans earning heaven by their own power, yet it is equally far from the idea that salvation requires no cooperation from the believer. Instead, the earliest Christians consistently taught a synergistic view: God initiates and empowers, and human beings respond freely and obediently. Our participation is real, but it is always rooted in God’s grace. In short, we have free will on whether or not to cooperate with God’s grace; and it is that grace which will produce the works. Submission is key. But it’s an on-going submission, not a one-time faith decision or prayer of salvation.

    The New Testament clearly affirms that salvation begins entirely with God’s initiative. As Paul writes, “By grace you have been saved… this is not your own doing” (Ephesians 2:8–9). No human act or decision forces God’s hand; salvation is a gift before it is anything else. Yet Scripture is equally insistent that our response to grace—our obedience, perseverance, repentance, and love—matters for our final salvation. God “will render to each one according to his works” (Romans 2:6-11).

    The Lord’s depiction of the final judgment in the sheep and the goats (Matthew 25:31-46) focuses not on internal belief but on lived love: feeding the hungry, caring for the poor, serving “the least of these.” Right before this, in the Parable of the Talents (Matthew 25:14–30), the servants were rewarded based on what they did with the talents (time, treasure, gifts, abilities) given to them by the master.

    In the Parable of the Sower (Matthew 13:3–23; Luke 8:4–15), the second and third types of soil both believed and received the word but later fell away or were choked by the cares of life. All four examples are judged by their fruit — their works or lack thereof. The warning is clear: believers who once received the word can fall away and lose what they had obtained.

    In the Parable of the Ten Virgins (Matthew 25:1–13), all ten went out to meet the bridegroom, but only five were prepared. The others were locked out when the Lord arrived. The question for us is: what must we do to be ready when He returns?

    The Parable of the Unfaithful (Unworthy) Servant (Luke 12:35–48; Matthew 24:45–51) reminds us that every believer — especially those in leadership — is a steward of what Christ has entrusted. The faithful servant perseveres even when the Master seems long in coming. At Christ’s return, faithfulness will be rewarded with joy, but negligence and hypocrisy will meet just judgment.

    In the Vine and the Branches (John 15:1–6), Jesus describes believers as branches “in” Him. Yet some choose not to remain — they are cut off, wither, and are thrown into the fire. For a branch to be cut off, it must first have been attached to the vine. Like fruitless branches in our own yards, those once productive but now barren will be cut off at the time of pruning.

    In sum of the parables, Jesus spends a lot of time telling us what we need to do to cooperate with his grace, the results of not doing so, and we should listen to him.  

    Paul warns: “I am reminding you, brothers, of the gospel I preached to you, which you indeed received and in which you also stand. You are being saved, if you hold fast to the word I preached to you—unless you believed in vain.” (1 Corinthians 15:1–2)

    Yes, we are not justified, as Paul tells us, by the works of the law (Galatians 2:16) but by faith. But every reading from the Church Fathers, and the full biblical context, clearly state that Paul is referring to the mosaic law of the Old Testament which we are no longer bound by; but he is not referring to the works of love that Christ has called us to. For Paul also tells us that if we, have faith but not love, we are “nothing” (1 Corinthians 13:2-3).

    And Jesus Himself declares the conditional nature of remaining in His love: “If you obey my commandments, you will remain in my love.” (John 15:10)

    James echoes this reality when he writes, “You see that a person is justified by works and not by faith alone” (James 2:24). He does not deny the necessity of faith; he insists that faith severed from obedient love is dead and cannot save. Perhaps the most balanced expression of biblical synergy appears in Philippians 2:12–13: “Work out your salvation… for God is at work in you.” God’s action empowers human action, and human response fulfills God’s purpose.

    This biblical pattern became the unquestioned foundation of early Christian teaching. The earliest Fathers rejected two extremes: the Pelagian idea that humans can earn salvation by natural effort, and the later notion that salvation requires no cooperation from the believer.

    Clement of Rome held both sides of the biblical tension together. He insisted that we are justified by faith yet also affirmed that we are justified by works—not works apart from grace, but works that manifest living faith. For Clement, final justification and salvation requires obedience, good works and perseverance.

    Ignatius of Antioch taught that real discipleship requires bearing the fruit of Christ and persevering to the end. It was not enough to profess Christ with the lips; one had to embody Christ through obedience, unity, humility, and steadfast endurance under suffering. This echoes Christ words that, “he who endures to the end, will be saved (Matt 24:13)”. He urges believers to persevere until the final moment of life, insisting that salvation is not secured by a single act of belief but by a life that remains faithful to Christ’s grace through trials, temptations, and even death.

    Justin Martyr explained that while each person is indeed judged according to his deeds, those deeds possess any saving value only because of Christ’s grace at work within the believer. In Justin’s theology, human actions matter eternally, but they matter precisely because they are responses to—and empowered by—the grace revealed through Christ.

    Irenaeus emphasized that God alone gives the growth in salvation, but he was equally clear that human beings must freely offer their will in cooperation with that divine work. For Irenaeus, salvation is not a mechanical process imposed upon passive creatures; it is a living, relational transformation in which God patiently forms the believer into the likeness of Christ. Yet this formation requires the person to respond, consent, and align his will with God’s action. Although grace initiates and accomplishes the entire healing and restoration of the human person, Irenaeus insisted that God does not save us without our participation.

    Origen frequently used the term “merit,” but only to describe the good that God’s grace produces in us—not something we generate on our own. Thus, “merit” is not a human achievement but a measure of how fully the believer has allowed God’s grace to bear fruit. Salvation remains entirely God’s initiative, yet God dignifies our cooperation by treating His own gifts in us as worthy of reward. In this way, Origen preserves both divine sovereignty and genuine human participation without ever crossing into the idea that salvation can be earned.

    Augustine, the Father most adamant against Pelagianism, taught that everything good in us—including our good works—is the result of God’s grace. His famous line summarizes the entire patristic worldview: “When God rewards our works, He is crowning His own gifts.” Far from diminishing human effort, Augustine believed that grace is what enables human effort to be genuine, fruitful, and pleasing to God. Pelagius had argued that human beings could obey God and achieve righteousness by the power of their natural will; Augustine responded by showing from Scripture and experience that the wounded human heart cannot heal or elevate itself. Only God’s grace can liberate the will from the bondage of sin and empower it to love God rightly. Yet Augustine did not erase human participation. Instead, he described salvation as God healing the will so that it can truly cooperate with Him.

    From the apostles to Augustine, the early Church consistently rejected the notion that human beings can earn salvation through their own strength. But the Fathers also rejected the idea that salvation is a one-time event detached from the believer’s transformation and obedience. The Christian life, as they understood it, is a dynamic relationship between God’s gracious action and the believer’s free, grace-enabled response. Salvation is not a passive possession but a living journey of becoming conformed to Christ. Grace does not eliminate the necessity of obedience; it makes obedience possible and meaningful.

    This synergistic vision can be summarized simply: salvation begins with God’s initiative, is sustained by God’s grace, and is completed by God’s power, yet it requires the real, willing cooperation of the believer. God did not create robots. He gave us free will to allow him to work in us and through us.

    Our works do not earn salvation, but they are the necessary fruits of grace at work within us. They are not a human attempt to climb to heaven; they are evidence that God Himself is healing, empowering, and transforming us. This is why Augustine’s phrase—“God crowns His own gifts”—became the definitive expression of the early Church’s teaching. The reward is real. The works are real. But their origin is God. We have free will on whether or not we allow God to fulfill the mission, plan and purpose that has for us.

    The early Church never saw salvation as a transaction based on human merit, nor as a legal fiction requiring no transformation. Instead, the Fathers understood salvation as the life of God growing within us, a life that demands our free cooperation and unfolds through faith expressing itself in love. Salvation is not earned. But it is not passive. It is a divine-human relationship—God acting, us responding, God empowering, we participating, God completing, we persevering. It is the story of grace inviting human freedom into communion. It is synergy, the ancient Christian vision of what it means to be saved.

    Next time, we’ll dive into whether or not the early Church, citing the fathers above and others, believed that salvation could be lost or forfeited?

  • I always start every day and end each day in prayer, as well as reading scripture. Specifically, in asking the Holy Spirit to put me in the right frame of mind of looking at life through a positive, spirit-filled lens, I begin and end in prayer of thanksgiving for what the Lord has blessed with that day and in life.

    On this Thanksgiving, I’m grateful for Amy, my wife of 25 years and our three children, a family who I love more than life itself. I’m grateful for my parents, who are still here to see the husband, father and man that God has molded me to become. I’m thankful for the community of friends that Amy and I have; as well as the group of men that God has blessed me with and encircled around me.

    And this year, I’m extremely grateful for the Eucharist. Appropriately, Eucharist means thanksgiving and the eucharistic feast is the real presence of Jesus’ body and blood in the bread and wine at the altar or the communion table. In Luke 24:32, Jesus was walking with the disciples and their hearts were burning when he was explaining the scriptures to them. But it wasn’t until the breaking of the bread (Luke 24:30–31) where their eyes were fully opened.

    This fits the experience for Amy and I the first 25+ years as Christians. We were energized by God’s word. We were burning with God’s word. But it wasn’t until the breaking of the bread for both of us, when we first desired the flesh of the Living Word as seekers, when eventually we partook in eating the flesh of the Living Word as converts where our eyes were fully opened. We had something as born-again believers, but not everything as we do now.

    From a spiritual standpoint, there are different ways to encounter Christ. We encounter the Lord through scripture reading, prayer, worship, fellowship with other believers and service to others. But for us, there’s been no experience more powerful than in the holiness, stillness, reverence and worship of the Catholic Mass.

    We’ve experienced this pouring out upon us firsthand, this power that we had never encountered before in our lives. Nothing has been more powerful than encountering Christ through the Real Presence in the Eucharist!

    The purifying, sanctifying, cleansing and peaceful aspect of eating and absorbing the Lord has given us a deep-rooted level of peace and contentment that we’ve never felt. The Eucharist was the missing thread that we have been searching for our entire lives. We now experience the richness and fullness of daily reading the Bible again, where we had run dry, of prayer and worship again, where we had run dry, all strengthened and held together by the power of Christ’s Body and Blood that we receive at Mass. The fullness of Christ and our faith gives us the endurance, and strength to persevere through the multitude of life’s trials and tribulations.

    We wish we had this fullness our entire lives, but our eyes were opened to what we didn’t know. We didn’t know that for the first 1500 years of Church history that everybody believed the bread and wine were the literal body and blood of Jesus.

    We didn’t know that the altar with the Eucharist was at the center of church worship everywhere from the very first generations after the apostles until it was replaced by a pulpit in some sects the last 500 years.

    We didn’t know that Ignatius of Antioch, who was discipled by John — the same John who wrote the Bread of Life discourse in John 6:22–71 — called the Eucharist the “medicine of immortality.”

    We didn’t know that Justin Martyr, describing the Mass in A.D. 155–159, referred to the Eucharist after consecration by the priest as “not as common bread or common drink, but as the flesh and blood of Jesus Christ.”

    We didn’t know that it was 500 years ago that a Swiss reformer named Ulrich Zwingli first advanced the theory that the bread and wine were symbolic.

    We didn’t know that sola scriptura (scripture only) and sola fide (faith alone) were theological interpretations and doctrinal inventions of the 1500s and nowhere to be found amongst the Church Fathers, and the early Church.

    We didn’t know that even Martin Luther believed in the Real Presence, that Luther believed Jesus meant what he said when he said, “This is my body… This is my blood” (Matthew 26:26–28; Mark 14:22–24; Luke 22:19–20).

    We didn’t realize that we believed it was symbolic because we were told it was symbolic by those we looked up to; and we didn’t realize that you read into scripture what you want to be true, what you are told is true by those in authority whom you respect — not necessarily what is true. And therefore, we didn’t know that scripture very emphatically teaches that the bread is the body of Christ and the wine is the blood of Christ (John 6:51–58).

    We didn’t know, because of the lens through which we read scripture, that six times in John 6 and in the Last Supper narratives Jesus says: “This IS my body… This IS my blood” (John 6:51–58; Matthew 26:26–28; Mark 14:22–24; Luke 22:19–20).

    We didn’t know that Paul reaffirmed this in Corinthians when he recounts Jesus telling his disciples, “This is my body… This cup is the new covenant in my blood” (1 Corinthians 11:23–25).

    We didn’t know scripturally and historically that the Eucharist is the New Testament fulfillment of the Holy of Holies — the place of God’s real presence (Hebrews 9:1–5; Hebrews 10:19–22).

    We didn’t realize, through the interpretive lens through which we read scripture, the physical damage that Paul addresses to the Church in Corinth about taking the body and blood in an unworthy manner negates any symbolic interpretation (1 Corinthians 11:27–30).

    We didn’t understand how one who takes communion in an “unworthy,” yet symbolic manner could be guilty of the body and the blood of the Lord (1 Corinthians 11:27) to the point that they were getting sick and dying if it is merely symbolic.

    We didn’t realize that all the times we took communion in a symbolic fashion, we would have been deemed by every one of the Church Fathers and the early Church as taking the body and blood in an unworthy, heretical manner.

    We didn’t realize that it was this altar that has kept the one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church together for 2000 years with all of its beauty and richness.

    We didn’t know there was a Church that traced all its roots back to Jesus and the apostles (Acts 2:42; Ephesians 2:20).

    We didn’t know there was a Church whose leader held the same keys that Jesus handed to Peter — giving him the authority to bind and loose on earth and heaven (Matthew 16:18–19).

    We didn’t realize there was a Church whose leadership was breathed upon by their predecessors with the responsibility to forgive or retain sins — who themselves were breathed upon going back in an unbroken chain to the apostles. (John 20:21–23; 2 Timothy 1:6).

    We didn’t know that in a crazy, chaotic world where nothing is constant, there is one Church that’s been around 2000 years and the gates of hell have not prevailed against it (Matthew 16:18).

    We didn’t know that anywhere you go in the world, you could go to one of these churches and the worship — down to the scripture readings that day — will be exactly the same.

    We didn’t know there was that much unity across 1.2 billion believers — unity centered around Christ at his altar where all believers are in communion with one another (1 Corinthians 10:16–17).

    Ultimately though, everything is according to God’s plan and purpose (Romans 8:28). And if we had this our entire lives, maybe we would be like so many who take it for granted? We are thankful and blessed that God reached us the way he reached us to bring us into his Kingdom when we were in our 20s. We are very grateful for everything we experienced along the way, and we’re very thankful to be where we are now!

  • As Amy and I started diving into discovering the roots for our faith in the early Church and reading scripture alongside the Church Fathers, one of the first pillars that came crumbling down for us was sola scriptura — or “scripture alone.” Simply put, that scripture is the sole and ultimate authority was, and is, simply implausible.

    I think there’s almost this notion among a lot of Christians reared in evangelical churches that we’ve always had the Bible. But Jesus didn’t leave us the Bible — He left us His Church (Matthew 16:18–19). He never left any instructions to write anything down (Luke 10:16; John 20:21–23). Ultimately, it was Church authority working together with scripture and tradition that produced the Bible.

    If you would’ve asked Amy or me five years ago as Christians what was the pillar and foundation of truth, we would’ve said “the Bible.” But the Bible doesn’t even give itself the ultimate authority; it gives it to the Church as Paul told Timothy:

    “But if I should be delayed, you should know how to behave in the household of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and foundation of truth.” (1 Timothy 3:15)

    If not for the Holy Spirit working through the teaching authority of the Church, the Bible couldn’t have been produced (John 14:26; John 16:13). Scripture alone doesn’t specify which books to include or how many were to be in the New Testament canon. The twenty-seven books that we have are never spelled out in scripture. The New Testament canon came through Church Tradition and the teaching authority of the Church (2 Thessalonians 2:15; Acts 15:1–29). If the early Church had operated under sola scriptura, we wouldn’t have a Bible today. The process for preserving and compiling the scriptures into the Bible took place through a multitude of Church councils — that is, through Church authority — over a time period of about 350 years.

    None of the Church Fathers argued solely from a position of sola scriptura. While the Fathers held a very high view of scripture (2 Timothy 3:16–17) and used it as the authority to dispel heresies contradicting scripture, they also appealed to Tradition to interpret it (1 Corinthians 11:2; 2 Thessalonians 3:6). Most importantly, none believed in individual interpretation of scripture, but rather in the authority of the universal (Catholic) Church and the unified consensus of the bishops. We wouldn’t have a Bible — or doctrines such as the Trinity, the divinity of Christ, or the Incarnation — without scripture working alongside tradition under the interpretive authority of the Church.

    Augustine, the most recognized of the Church Fathers and the most influential on Western Christianity, said: “I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.” And it was Church authority, interpreting scripture along with Tradition, that held the unity of the Church together. For one thousand years, there was biblical unity (John 17:20–23; 1 Corinthians 1:10–13) with only one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church under the authority of the bishops in communion with the Bishop of Rome. The next five hundred years saw only two Churches — the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Church.

    We’ve seen the results in the last five hundred years of removing Church authority when it comes to scriptural interpretation under sola scriptura — and it’s not been pretty. There would be credibility for sola scriptura if there were only one unified Protestant or Lutheran Church. But sadly, the biblically unified Body of Christ has been shattered into thousands of man-made denominations, independent, and non-denominational churches — all claiming scriptural authority but in constant schism and unbiblical division over their varying interpretations (Romans 16:17; Ephesians 4:3–6, 11–13).

    When we take the lid off Church authority and leave interpretation up to private judgment — supposedly through the guidance of the Holy Spirit — what we find is that everyone has an interpretive lens. If the Holy Spirit were truly guiding, under sola scriptura, all these fragmented churches and man-made denominations born out of division, why is the end result the exact opposite of what Jesus and Paul tell us about unity and being “one”? (John 17:21; Ephesians 4:13; 1 Corinthians 12:12–27)

    The Bible doesn’t lay out a list of “essentials,” which is why there are so many disagreements across thousands of Protestant denominations. None of this disunity is biblical (Matthew 12:25; 1 Corinthians 14:33). Who among Protestants can firmly define what the gospel is? Whether you’re a five-point Calvinist, a free-will Arminian, or somewhere in between, you’ll have very different views on salvation, the gospel, and evangelization. The same goes for doctrines like the Lord’s Supper (real presence or symbolic?) and baptism (salvific or symbolic?).

    Obviously, Jesus knew this, which is why He left us His Church — not a Bible — and entrusted His Church with great power and authority (Matthew 16:18–19; Matthew 18:18). He gave the keys to Peter with the authority to bind and loose on earth and in heaven (Matthew 18:18; John 20:21–23). Paul knew this, which is why he gave the ultimate authority to the Church as the pillar and foundation of truth (1 Timothy 3:15). And the early Christians and Church Fathers knew this, always ceding final authority to the Church (Acts 15:1–29). When there was disagreement, they didn’t just start another church down the street or leave to join one that agreed with their interpretation.

    Finally, all Christians — whether they claim scriptural authority or not — hold to traditions that are outside of scripture (2 Thessalonians 2:15; John 21:25). Based on your church tradition, you may be part of a denomination — but denominations are man-made, not scriptural (1 Corinthians 1:10–13).

    You may also believe that baptism is symbolic, and that the Lord’s Supper is symbolic. But those beliefs are not scriptural; they’re based on modern interpretations of church tradition, doctrines nowhere found for the first fifteen hundred years of Church history or in scripture (John 6:53–56; Acts 2:38).

    You may believe that baptism is simply “a public profession of faith,” or that “a personal relationship with Jesus Christ” is essential for salvation. But both are modern evangelical traditions based upon selective scriptural interpretations.

    Jesus, nor Paul, nor any New Testament writer tells us to read our Bibles every day — that developed later as a modern tradition for foundational spiritual growth.

    Nowhere in the Bible is Christian marriage formation spelled out; yet every Christian church follows a similar tradition when it comes to the ceremony and what it takes to authenticate the union of marriage.

    The gospel itself is not concisely spelled out, which is why there’s so much disagreement among Protestant believers about what it means to be saved.

    There’s no “prayer of salvation” in the Bible, yet almost every evangelical church follows a tradition of leading someone to recite a traditional prayer to deem someone as saved or born again.

    Many evangelical Christians believe in a rapture, but that’s nowhere found in scripture — it’s an interpretation that didn’t even exist until about two centuries ago.

    Yes, as Christ-followers we should all hold to a very high view of sacred scripture (2 Timothy 3:16–17). But there’s much that the Bible doesn’t tell us, or isn’t clear on, which is why tradition and the teaching authority of the Church have been needed to interpret the scriptures. We need to recognize our finite minds when reading a Bible handed down through multiple centuries, cultures, and translations — an ancient text of many books, written by many authors over hundreds of years. Yes, we should prayerfully ask the Holy Spirit to help us discern scripture (John 14:26). But we must also realize the distortions of our own lens in reading it. The evidence on sola scriptura is in — and it’s not been pretty.

    Author’s Note – None of the above is meant to disparage the awesome work for the Kingdom being done in so many evangelical Protestant churches. There’s no shortage of evangelicals and Protestants, as well as evangelical and Protestant churches having a TREMENDOUS IMPACT for the Kingdom of God in reaching the world around them. Churches led by, and filled with, mighty servants who’ve given their lives to the Lord. Amy and I have benefited, as well as served alongside so many of these humble servants. Many of whom are lifetime friends. The Lord in His infinite love, grace and mercy works through the unbiblical division in his body. But how much more effective can we be if, even through our disagreements, we were working together?

    I’ve just seen too many instances of churches, even some from the same denomination, that won’t work with other churches down the street or across town, for one reason or another, to serve, to minister and reach people for the Gospel. Part of the reason, I’m writing two books and why I launched this site is to help educate myself, and hopefully others that are interested in learning about church history, the early Church and the Church Fathers.

    The hope and prayer being for those that join us on the journey is to at least develop a healthy understanding of the foundational roots of the Christian faith, and the ONLY two Christian churches and traditions — Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox – that actually trace all their roots back to the apostles and Jesus. This would go a long way in fostering unity as divided Christians, even among those of us who disagree, in dispelling so much of the misinformation and erroneous teachings about those two foundational Christian traditions that’s led to so much ignorance, ugliness and divisiveness among brothers and sisters in Christ. Only then in unity can we truly hope to have the deep impact upon the culture that we’re called to have in The Great Commission of Matthew 28:18-20. An impact we’re too fragmented and divided to have now.

    I truly believe this is possible, if and only if, we’re able to recognize our own biases and look objectively upon the historical evidence that we have access to in reading scripture through the eyes of the Church Fathers.

  • As with any maturing born-again Christian in a Bible-teaching church, one of the first passages I ever committed to memory was Ephesians 2:8–9:

    “For by grace you have been saved through faith, and this is not from you; it is the gift of God; it is not from works, so no one may boast.”

    Now to this day, I’ve not met, nor do I know any Christ-following believer or Christian tradition that doesn’t affirm Ephesians 2:8–9 — salvation is by grace, through faith.

    However, those verses have always been memorized and quoted to the exclusion of Ephesians 2:10:

    “For we are his handiwork, created in Christ Jesus for the good works that God has prepared in advance, that we should live in them.”

    Part of the problem is that Scripture was not written with chapters and verses — those were man-made additions added much later, in the 1500s. While Scripture memorization is vital, verses are too often plucked and isolated to fulfill narratives and justify doctrines in ways that neither the apostles nor the Church Fathers ever intended.

    Going back to verse 10, Paul tells us that we “should” live in the good works that God prepared for us. Notice that he doesn’t say that we “will” live in them. There’s a big difference between saying something “should” happen and saying something “will” happen. So, the works aren’t just an automatic outflow of faith. That they “should” happen means we have a role in determining — and cooperating with — God’s grace on whether or not we live out those good works (Philippians 2:12–13).

    And what happens if we don’t do the good works that Jesus prepared for us in advance? The answers couldn’t be any clearer throughout Scripture. Jesus specifically tells us in his parables what we are to do to live out our faith — and what happens if we don’t. We would all be wise to take Him at His word.

    In the Parable of the Sheep and the Goats (Matthew 25:31–46), what’s the first thing He’s going to do when He comes back? Is He going to separate us by those who had faith? No — He’s going to separate us by those who did the good works He called us to do: feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, and visiting the imprisoned.

    Note that neither here, nor anywhere in the aftermath of any of the following parables does Jesus sit his disciples down and explain that the works are merely the evidence of faith. Faith isn’t even mentioned in this, or any other parable.

    In the Parable of the Talents (Matthew 25:14–30), the servant who is cast out “where there is weeping and gnashing of teeth” wasn’t an outsider. He called his master ‘Master’, and the master called him his ‘servant’. This represents someone within the body of believers who failed to use what was entrusted to him.

    In the Parable of the Sower (Matthew 13:3–23; Luke 8:4–15), the second and third types of soil both believed and received the word but later fell away or were choked by the cares of life. All four examples are judged by their fruit — their works or lack thereof. The warning is clear: believers who once received the word can fall away and lose what they had obtained.

    In the Parable of the Ten Virgins (Matthew 25:1–13), all ten went out to meet the bridegroom, but only five were prepared. The others were locked out when the Lord arrived. The question for us is: what must we do to be ready when He returns?

    The Parable of the Unfaithful (Unworthy) Servant (Luke 12:35–48; Matthew 24:45–51) reminds us that every believer — especially those in leadership — is a steward of what Christ has entrusted. The faithful servant perseveres even when the Master seems long in coming. At Christ’s return, faithfulness will be rewarded with joy, but negligence and hypocrisy will meet just judgment.

    In the Vine and the Branches (John 15:1–6), Jesus describes believers as branches “in” Him. Yet some choose not to remain — they are cut off, wither, and are thrown into the fire. For a branch to be cut off, it must first have been attached to the vine. Like fruitless branches in our own yards, those once productive but now barren will be cut off at the time of pruning.

    Paul exhorts believers to “work out your salvation with fear and trembling” (Philippians 2:12–13) and reminds the Corinthians that salvation is an ongoing process:

    “I am reminding you, brothers, of the gospel I preached to you, which you indeed received and in which you also stand. You are being saved, if you hold fast to the word I preached to you—unless you believed in vain.” (1 Corinthians 15:1–2)

    Yes, we are not justified, as Paul tells us, by the works of the law (Galatians 2:16) but by faith. But every reading from the Church Fathers, and the full biblical context, clearly state that Paul is referring to the mosaic law of the Old Testament which we are no longer bound by; but he is not referring to the works of love that Christ has called us to. For Paul also tells us that if we, have faith but not love, we are “nothing” (1 Corinthians 13:2-3).

    James 2:24 states — and it’s the only place “faith alone” appears in Scripture — that “a person is justified by works and not by faith alone.”  He precedes that statement, in 2:14 by saying, ” if someone claims to have faith, but not works. Can that faith save him?”  

    And Jesus Himself declares the conditional nature of remaining in His love: “If you obey my commandments, you will remain in my love.” (John 15:10)

    As the Church Fathers taught, salvation is a gift of divine grace, freely initiated by God, yet requiring the believer’s cooperation. Grace empowers every good action, but it does not override human freedom. Irenaeus, Chrysostom, and Augustine affirmed that grace heals and strengthens the will so we may respond to God’s call in righteousness.

    Because grace restores rather than replaces freedom, the Fathers also held that salvation could be lost through willful sin, unbelief, or neglect of one’s faith. Tertullian, Cyprian, and Origen warned that it is not enough to begin the Christian life — one must persevere in faith and obedience (Matthew 24:13; Hebrews 10:26–31). Even Augustine maintained that believers must “remain in Christ” to be saved (John 15:4–6). Grace must be continually received and lived out through prayer, repentance, and good works.

    Faith alone is a doctrinal invention that was unheard of, and nowhere to found for the first 1500 years of church history. The interpretation didn’t exist because the Early Church that were handed the scriptures didn’t interpret and weren’t taught to read the scriptures that way.

    In summary, the early Church saw salvation not as a one-time transaction but as a lifelong cooperation between God and the believer. Grace is both the source and sustainer of faith, while the human will, restored by that grace, must freely respond in love and obedience. For the Fathers, to persist in faith was to remain in grace; to reject or neglect it was to risk losing communion with God. Salvation, therefore, was never seen as a “once saved, always saved” one-time decision. The totality of Ephesians 2:8–10, read in full context, is grace through faith — working itself out in love (Galatians 5:6; James 2:17; 1 John 3:18).

  • On All Saints Day, it’s important in venerating the Saints to understand why we honor and venerate those who came before us.

    In the same way that great athletes, study other great athletes who came before them as role models, we study the saints and the lives they lived in fulfilling the Lord‘s plan, purpose and mission for their lives as examples to us; as we allow the Holy Spirit to work through us in fulfilling God‘s plan, purpose, and mission for our lives!

    While this will be covered in more detail in a future post, the veneration of the Saints was customary in the early church among the church fathers on scriptural grounds. Clement of Rome, Ignatius of Antioch, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Tertullian, up through Jerome and Augustine just to name a few of the Fathers who showed veneration through prayers of intercession, and feast days.

    And why wouldn’t they? If we’re surrounded by such a great cloud of witnesses (Hebrews 12:1) why wouldn’t we ask them to intercede for us? Especially when we know that biblically, they present our requests to the Lord (Rev 5:8, Rev 8:3-4)

    For if we would ask our closest friends, and those we know who love and serve the Lord to pray for us. How much more should we be asking those who live in heaven, and close to Lord to in intercede for us in prayer?

    The early Church venerated the saints, beginning with martyrs and later extending to other holy figures. This veneration was seen as an expression of the communion of saints — the unity of the Church on earth with those already in heaven — and was always distinguished from the worship owed only to God.

    If living Christians are urged to intercede for one another, how much more could the righteous in heaven — now perfected and closer to God — pray for those still on earth? The early Fathers viewed prayer to the saints as a natural extension of the intercessory communion already practiced among believers.

    On why we should commemorate, study and honor of the Saints, Ronda Chervin – a convert from Judaism, professor of philosophy and theology – said it best on why we venerate the Saints:

    “The saints are the great revolutionaries in the area of loving God and neighbor. Through their total commitment to God, they are able to extend themselves past the boundaries of what their own society is willing to see as lovable….

    Saint Vincent de Paul discovered the lovableness of slaves and of abandoned babies. And different saints through the centuries overcame the lethargy of their fellow citizens by expanding enormous energies in the founding of the first free hospitals and schools for the poor.

    In more recent times we have Saint Thérèse of Lisieux, who found ways to turn the most trivial occupations into gifts of love, thus bringing Christ closer to the limited bourgeois class to which she belonged.

    Saint John Bosco, relying solely on daily contributions, was able to feed, clothe, shelter, and train hundreds of street boys in Northern Italy.

    And a missionary nun, Mother Teresa, worked in the teeming streets of Calcutta, gathering up those dying in rags to care for and assure them that at least in their last moments of life they are loved and wanted. The list of saints and their deeds of love is endless….

    If we are really interested in the happiness of those closest to us, can we ignore the depth of love which the saints show us is possible through total commitment to Christ?

    We should want to imitate them, not because of some vainglorious desire to be famous, but because we wish to give ourselves generously to those who need us. But we cannot do this unless we become holy (totally open to Christ); only then, through love, can we give them something of infinite and eternal value….

    Because of the radiance of those personalities who love totally, we find them as lovable as people we know personally, and therefore call on their help as participants in Christ’s inner life of grace with trusting confidence. By relating to them we get a foretaste of the final union of all mankind in Christ’s Mystical Body. One day we shall arrive in eternity where we shall dance together in the sheer joy of perfect love.”